W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2009

RE: ISSUE-60 (sysinfo-accelerometer): orientation, acceleration compass in System Information [System Information and Events API]

From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:25:46 -0800
To: Device APIs and Policy Working Group WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <753F67ADE6F5094C9F1DBA00D1BAA8D312D606EEC1@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
We did decide to move this to the Geolocation WG. I separated out the Compass spec to pass along to the Geolocation WG as:

http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/compass.html


Thanks
Dzung Tran
Intel Corp

-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Device APIs and Policy Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 04:40 AM
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-60 (sysinfo-accelerometer): orientation, acceleration compass in System Information [System Information and Events API]


ISSUE-60 (sysinfo-accelerometer): orientation, acceleration compass in System Information [System Information and Events API]

http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/60


Raised by: Max Froumentin
On product: System Information and Events API

From: 
http://www.w3.org/mid/4B2F69E6.4040804@opera.com


> 15) Given that this is a pretty long list of sensors, maybe we should
> add orientation, acceleration, and compass.  Theses are suppose to be
> done in the W3C Geolocation WG, but I do not see why they can't be
> added here... they are pretty small additions and do not have exactly
> the same privacy concerns.

I was hoping geolocation to do the work for us, but fair enough ;) I'd like a decision from the WG before starting, though. 



Received on Monday, 21 December 2009 18:26:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:03 GMT