W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ReSpec fixes

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:51:02 +0100
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <4C6E1733-0ADE-4E51-B60B-93C251C006E7@robineko.com>
To: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:47 , Max Froumentin wrote:
> On 03/12/2009 13:37, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> More fixes:
>>   - IDL arrays are now supported
>>   - optional is now supported
>>   - leading whitespace is trimmed from examples
>> This addresses: ISSUE-49, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-50.
> Thanks. Small nitpicking not warranting an issue:
> can we remove the "in" keyword, given that it's optional and doesn't serve any purpose? Or at least leave it to the spec editor, i.e.
> when I declare a method without "in" reSpec should not add it.

I think that it should be consistent throughout a spec (and the extended parameter syntax already doesn't use in, though it generates it). I've added a noIDLIn option which you can turn on to remove them.

Robin Berjon
  robineko  hired gun, higher standards
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 13:51:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:41 UTC