- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:51:02 +0100
- To: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
On Dec 3, 2009, at 13:47 , Max Froumentin wrote: > On 03/12/2009 13:37, Robin Berjon wrote: >> More fixes: >> >> - IDL arrays are now supported >> - optional is now supported >> - leading whitespace is trimmed from examples >> >> This addresses: ISSUE-49, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-50. > > Thanks. Small nitpicking not warranting an issue: > can we remove the "in" keyword, given that it's optional and doesn't serve any purpose? Or at least leave it to the spec editor, i.e. > when I declare a method without "in" reSpec should not add it. I think that it should be consistent throughout a spec (and the extended parameter syntax already doesn't use in, though it generates it). I've added a noIDLIn option which you can turn on to remove them. -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 13:51:44 UTC