Hi, I'd like to get a rough view of where people stand with respect to API versioning, so here's a straw poll. Straw polls are different from formal votes in that they aren't binding for the WG — they just provide for a quick snapshot to get a feel for the state of a debate. Also, answers are per participant, not per company (though we'll notice ballot stuffing of course). Here's the SP: This house believes that explicit version mechanisms on an API, such as have been done elsewhere using for instance hasFeature(), a version attribute on interface object, or a version parameter passed to a constructor are not useful in a web context and should be forsaken. Future revisions to given interfaces should either be strictly additive, change names, or ensure that what limited deltas are made do not break real-world code. Answers can be: - I Agree - I Disagree - I Don't Care Please reply by September 1st. Thanks! -- Robin Berjon robineko — setting new standards http://robineko.com/Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 12:49:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:13:59 GMT