W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2009

Re: WebIDL checking (was: Editing specifications with ReSpec.js)

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:49:49 +0200
Cc: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0E3C673B-AE68-4223-8C1B-B8D0A29D9FB9@robineko.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
On Aug 6, 2009, at 18:17 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:48:45 +0200, Robin Berjon  
> <robin@robineko.com> wrote:
>> I'd really like to see it as an option in PubRules and if possible  
>> there by default (though there's no emergency). I really like it  
>> when PubRules catches errors, so the more it can look for the  
>> better IMHO.
>
> I rather not have that until things are more stable. See e.g:
>
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2009JulSep/0002.html
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2009JulSep/0003.html

Yes, I'm aware of that. But PubRules can warn, and even if it returned  
a red flag you can still talk to the human on the team.

--
Robin Berjon
   robineko  setting new standards
   http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 16:50:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:38 UTC