W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2009

Re: WebIDL checking (was: Editing specifications with ReSpec.js)

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:48:45 +0200
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <22D516D7-EC97-472E-BF02-9143A1DC59BD@robineko.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:34 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 17:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> On Aug 6, 2009, at 13:41 , Marcin Hanclik wrote:
>>> Probably we will want to verify Web IDL fragments, we may want to
>>> check some semantics or dependencies between various parts of
>>> various specs.
>>
>> That should be part of PubRules checking (so that a spec cannot be
>> released without the checks),
>
> (not sure that belong to pubrules, but it clearly is something that
> WebIDL-producing groups should ensure before requesting publication)

I'd really like to see it as an option in PubRules and if possible  
there by default (though there's no emergency). I really like it when  
PubRules catches errors, so the more it can look for the better IMHO.

--
Robin Berjon
   robineko — setting new standards
   http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 15:49:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:38 UTC