W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Editing specifications with ReSpec.js

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:37:03 +0200
Cc: <jmcf@tid.es>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>, <marcosc@opera.com>
Message-Id: <DF4D654A-4F27-4884-BC01-FB156DDBFB2D@robineko.com>
To: <richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com>
On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:16 , <richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
> My previous email crossed with yours, Robin :(

Such is the internet!

> So now I understand the process I would still suggest that the specs
> minus JS applies to all drafts too.

You mean Editor's Drafts too? I think that would encourage people to  
not commit as often as they should, which is IMHO a bad idea. The ED  
drafts are mostly to help the WG work and communicate with its  
community. Whenever there's a big difference between the ED and the  
latest published WD a new publication should be made in order to reach  
a wider audience (you know, publish early, publish often ;).

Robin Berjon
   robineko  setting new standards
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 15:38:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:38 UTC