public-device-apis-log@w3.org from November 2019 by thread

Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings (#171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 28 November)

Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) pes via GitHub (Friday, 22 November)

Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Saturday, 23 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) pes via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 25 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 26 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)
Re: [sensors] Spec should include mandatory mitigations for privacy harms / risks (#397) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 27 November)

Closed: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker (#299) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 21 November)

Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker (#299) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 21 November)

Closed: [sensors] Remove text about non-explicit permissions (#396) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)

Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 14 November)

Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub (Monday, 18 November)
Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 18 November)
Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) pes via GitHub (Monday, 18 November)
Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 18 November)
Re: [sensors] Update "Security and privacy considerations" and "Permissions API" (#400) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)

Re: [vibration] Editorial: Fix ReSpec cite error (#24) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub (Thursday, 14 November)

[sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) fergald via GitHub (Thursday, 14 November)

Re: [sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 14 November)
Re: [sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) pes via GitHub (Monday, 18 November)
Re: [sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) fergald via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [sensors] access to orientation without access to linear acceleration? (#399) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)

Re: [vibration] Block navigator.vibrate in cross-origin iframes (#15) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 November)

Re: [vibration] Block navigator.vibrate in cross-origin iframes (#15) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub (Wednesday, 13 November)

Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) solarsu via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)

Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Amumu via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) solarsu via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Monday, 11 November)

Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) pes via GitHub (Thursday, 7 November)

Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) Reilly Grant via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)
Re: [deviceorientation] Move fingerprintable APIs behind permissions (#85) pes via GitHub (Tuesday, 19 November)

Re: [wake-lock] WakeLock.request() returns a promise that never resolves (#226) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Monday, 4 November)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 November 2019 09:10:28 UTC