Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183)

Why keep abort()? It seems like having two ways to do something, the standard-platform way the only-this-spec way, will be confusing for authors.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by domenic
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/wake-lock/pull/183#issuecomment-484155754 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 16:08:22 UTC