- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:08:35 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
>naming a normative DFN with an informative keyword ("can") which introduces further ambiguities.
Quite the contrary, I feel it would be confusing to use RFC 2119 terms in a definition.
For precedence, see e.g.:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#can-share-memory-with
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#check-if-we-can-run-script
--
GitHub Notification of comment by anssiko
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/pull/288#issuecomment-332165011 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 11:08:25 UTC