Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint

> and (2) === was a requirement (see #8).

Thanks for the links! This is exactly what I had asked for at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/152#issuecomment-289011285  :) 

Still I would like to hear people's opinion on whether it is OK if appearance of one object transparently modifies behavior of another object.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by pozdnyakov
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/152#issuecomment-304302188 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 14:46:51 UTC