Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state from Rick Waldron via GitHub on 2017-03-28 (public-device-apis-log@w3.org from March 2017)

From: Rick Waldron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:09:46 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-289820883-1490717384-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Given: 

![](https://yuml.me/diagram/plain;scale:180/activity/(start)-construct%3E(A)-start%3E(B)-%3E(C)-stop%3E(D),(B)-%3E(errored),(C)-%3E(errored),(D)-start%3E(B).svg)


When would a program write `if (sensor.state === A) { ...`, such that it would be distinct from `if (sensor.state === D) { ...`?



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rwaldron
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-289820883 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 16:09:55 UTC