W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [sensors] Should a "suspended" state be added

From: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 07:19:03 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-311883564-1498720742-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@pozdnyakov do we need other 'internal' states? For example, when stop is called and sensor cannot be stopped synchronously, do we need 'deactivating' state to handle multiple stop() invocations?

GitHub Notification of comment by alexshalamov
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/223#issuecomment-311883564 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 07:19:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 12:18:53 UTC