- From: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:41:56 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
@tobie As I mentioned, I would like to avoid to have references to internal data of a sensor object. But either way is fine for me (cloning or making reference). I have no objections if getter will return latest reading and in next update local reference would be `!== sensor.getLatestReading()`. Maybe someone will find it even useful, e.g. cached value can be invalidated and updated with latest. If you are planning to change Sensor.reading to sensor.getLatestReading(), semantics will be slightly different, for example, after stop() is called, should sensor.getLatestReading() return null? If not, what happens if permission is revoked. Anyways, your explanation about how you want API to behave was helpful and few fixes need to be made to implementation to align with the spec. Thanks. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alexshalamov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/ambient-light/issues/15#issuecomment-257514976 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2016 08:42:02 UTC