RE: New draft - Core Vocab 1d

Thank you Jo. I notice you did a good general tidy of the rest of the document, in addition to adding the comment about scripting.
 
So, currently there is still no separate property to deal with scripting, and image format support is still just for images and not a generic all-purpose enumeration of any embeddable types.
 
As I expected, we debated this for a long time on Monday without coming to a conclusion, though perhaps now we are more familiar with the issues. There are pros and cons on both sides of the argument, though I think it is certainly clear that we wish to see the vocabulary including script support somehow.
 
Please give some more thought to this issue, and we will hopefully reach a conclusion during Monday's teleconference.
 
---Rotan.
 

________________________________

From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org on behalf of Jo Rabin
Sent: Thu 24/01/2008 19:12
To: public-ddwg@w3.org
Subject: New draft - Core Vocab 1d




I made some changes reflecting Jose's contribution and current debate
about script support - also reduced the TOC level.

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/Drafts/corevocabulary/080124

and the diff from the previous version is at

http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2
FMWI%2FDDWG%2Fdrafts%2Fcorevocabulary%2F071204&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FDDWG%2Fdrafts%2Fcorevocabulary%2F080124


Jo

Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 10:43:41 UTC