W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg@w3.org > April 2008

Core Vocab Draft 1i

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:16:55 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4DEF8E3@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Rotan Hanrahan" <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, <public-ddwg@w3.org>

To save Rotan fiddling with it here is a new draft with 1 change from
1h:

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/corevocabulary/080411

Jo
[Door slams shut behind him]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Rotan Hanrahan
> Sent: 11 April 2008 06:48
> To: public-ddwg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft
> 
> 
> I rather like the device and webBrowser aspect names as they are.
> 
> And if we're now down to the point of discussing the case of letters,
then
> I'll take it as a sign that the substantive work is (in all
likelihood)
> OK. That's important, because with our XMLSpec guru away for a few
days,
> it falls to me to deal with the final changes. (Many many thanks Jo
for
> everything to date!)
> 
> So, putting the chair's hat firmly on my head, I'm going to propose
that
> this document (when the proposed edits of the past few hours have been
> addressed) is as good as we can make it in the time available ahead of
the
> moratorium on publication. I give the group one work day (today,
Friday)
> to become familiar again with the *substantive* material of the
document
> and be prepared to resolve to publish this document at our meeting on
> Monday. Apologies to anyone who will have to read this over the
weekend,
> but as it has been available in evolving draft form for many months
I'm
> assuming that most people are already familiar with it.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed (and *please* no more typos or
> tweaks, I'm not as good with XMLSpec as Jo is!!).
> 
> ---Rotan.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org on behalf of Jo Rabin
> Sent: Fri 11/04/2008 00:00
> To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA; public-ddwg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft
> 
> 
> 
> That is deliberate similarity and think that to do otherwise would be
> inconsistent.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
> Sent: 10 April 2008 22:56
> To: public-ddwg@w3.org
> Subject: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I have noted that in the latest draft Core Vocabulary, aspect names
does
> not start with upper case. They are: device and webBrowser.
> 
> 
> 
> Perhaps it could be a good idea to have aspect names starting with
upper
> case as it will serve to differentiate them against property names.
> 
> 
> 
> What do others think?
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 08:17:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:00:16 UTC