W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg@w3.org > April 2008

RE: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft

From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:47:48 -0400
Message-ID: <D5306DC72D165F488F56A9E43F2045D39C6D3E@FTO.mobileaware.com>
To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>

I rather like the device and webBrowser aspect names as they are.
 
And if we're now down to the point of discussing the case of letters, then I'll take it as a sign that the substantive work is (in all likelihood) OK. That's important, because with our XMLSpec guru away for a few days, it falls to me to deal with the final changes. (Many many thanks Jo for everything to date!)
 
So, putting the chair's hat firmly on my head, I'm going to propose that this document (when the proposed edits of the past few hours have been addressed) is as good as we can make it in the time available ahead of the moratorium on publication. I give the group one work day (today, Friday) to become familiar again with the *substantive* material of the document and be prepared to resolve to publish this document at our meeting on Monday. Apologies to anyone who will have to read this over the weekend, but as it has been available in evolving draft form for many months I'm assuming that most people are already familiar with it.
 
Thanks to everyone who has contributed (and *please* no more typos or tweaks, I'm not as good with XMLSpec as Jo is!!).
 
---Rotan.

________________________________

From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org on behalf of Jo Rabin
Sent: Fri 11/04/2008 00:00
To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA; public-ddwg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft



That is deliberate similarity and think that to do otherwise would be inconsistent.

 

________________________________

From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
Sent: 10 April 2008 22:56
To: public-ddwg@w3.org
Subject: Aspect names in the Core Vocabulary latest draft

 

Hi,

 

I have noted that in the latest draft Core Vocabulary, aspect names does not start with upper case. They are: device and webBrowser. 

 

Perhaps it could be a good idea to have aspect names starting with upper case as it will serve to differentiate them against property names. 

 

What do others think?

 

Best Regards
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 05:50:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:00:16 UTC