W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg@w3.org > October 2007

Comments on the current version of the ontology

From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:22:48 +0200
To: public-uwa@w3.org, public-ddwg@w3.org
Cc: mymobileweb-celtic-es@lists.morfeo-project.org
Message-id: <fb3751f1ab0.ab0fb3751f1@tid.es>
Hi,

Here are my comments on [1]. 

+ Editorial:

"of information that can be used to adapt materials materials from".
Materials is +duplicated
"within appropriately written reasoning systems." a reference to Pellet
or some other open source reasoning system would be useful
"...defining unique names for each class ...". This is confusing. 

Suggested: "The mechanism consists of creating a common property
'deliveryContextEntityName' shared by all classes. This property for
each class is restricted to have a distinct value (a unique string)."

+ Substantial

* During our discussion on August 16th [2] based on [3] I agreed on
providing alternative ways of providing alternateNames to the
properties. I have done that. You can see the example on the attached
OWL file for the property supportedNetworkBearers with has two
annotation properties for the alternative ways of referring to it. 

* If UAProf vocabulary hasn't been used deliberately We would suggest to
drop the Associated_UAProf_Entity class from the ontology and treat
UAProf properties as annotation properties (literals) but not instances.
For the supportedNetworkBearers property I also provide the example. 

* Regarding the usage of schema subtypes in the ontology for modelling
units we are still working on the matter and we provide an update very
soon. 

New issues of this version

+ The originator field, perhaps we should use FOAF (or vCard) as the
mechanism for representing people or organizations. The DCO would import
these ontologies. 

+ Derived Properties: I'm thinking ... perhaps these informal
descriptions could be formalized as rules bound to the ontology in some
rule language ... I think we need to investigate further on this

Best Regards

[1]
http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/DeliveryContextOntology/2007-10-31/DCOntology.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-uwawg-minutes.html
[3]
http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/Feedback_on_the_W3C%27s_proposal_of_the_delivery_context_ontology
[4] http://www.foaf-project.org
[5] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns

----
José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
Telefónica I+D


Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:23:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:51 GMT