W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Meeting Summary - 05 March 2007

From: Christian Timmerer \(ITEC\) <christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:10:28 +0100
To: "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, <public-ddwg@w3.org>
Cc: "'Rotan Hanrahan'" <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, "'Cedric Kiss'" <cedric@w3.org>, <christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>
Message-ID: <004501c75fcf$48921270$d9b63750$@timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>


Dear Michael,

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Definition of "Device Description"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   - We have agreement that we can't start building an ontology
>     until we have a common understanding of "device description"
> 
>   - We seem to have agreement about the need to make the
>     definition of "device description" more generic than just
>     being limited to the delivery of a web page, but instead to
>     any aspect, but with the DDWG as a group focusing on the
>     specific aspect that has to do with adaptation.
> 
>   RESOLVED: Do one more iteration on a proposal what is meant by
>   "device" and "device description" and send out for public
>   discussion by end of this week.
[Christian Timmerer (ITEC)] From my point of view the current definition of
device [1] is limited to end user devices. I'm wondering whether DDWG will
extend this definition to any apparatus along the delivery path that serves
the overall aim of device independence. I know there exists terms like proxy
or gateway but there is a need for describing them as well, e.g., for
adaptation purposes.

I'm looking forward to the proposal by the end of this week. 

Thank you.
Best regards,
 -Christian

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/


> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Starting the ontology work
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    We're using the Protege application and need to understand how
>    to break up Protege projects for group work.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reports from editors.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   - Ecosystem: we had a contribution related to this on the
>     internal mail list and are continuing to discuss it
>   - We made some updatet to the wiki (uploaded "Top-ten
>     properties" on wiki)
>   - responded to OMA
>   - API and structure have not started yet
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Attendees
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Pontus Carlsson (Drutt) [scribe]
>   Martin Jones (Volantis)
>   Andrea Trasatti (M:Metrics/WURFL)
>   Cedric Kiss (W3C)
>   Kevin Smith (Vodafone)
>   Rafael Casero (SATEC)
>   Rotan Hanrahan (MobileAware)
>   Jo Rabin (dotMobi)
>   Rodrigo Garcia (CTIC)
>   Nacho Marin (CTIC)
>   Michael(tm) Smith (W3C) [late]
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 09:10:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:00:13 UTC