W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg-comments@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1966)

From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:06:59 +0200
To: "rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com" <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Cc: "public-ddwg-comments@w3.org" <public-ddwg-comments@w3.org>
Message-id: <93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F48905039F8833D6@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet>

I accept this response
________________________________________
De: rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com [rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 29 de mayo de 2008 17:54
Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
CC: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1966)

 Dear José Manuel Cantera ,

The Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group has reviewed
the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Device
Description Repository Simple API published on 4 Apr 2008. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080529.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-ddwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 9 June
2008. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group,
Matt Womer
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F489050397FB9F34@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/


=====

Your comment on 3 Vocabularies:
> Regarding Section 3, Vocabularies, it is said
>
> "Property and Aspect names must be unique in their namespace and must
> conform to the
> syntax<http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName>
> defined in "Namespaces in XML" [XML
>
Namespaces]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#ref-Namespaces>.
> The value __NULL ('_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved as the null
> Aspect name."
>
> What is the null aspect name? Under which conditions it should be
> used?
>
> The document should clarify


Working Group Resolution (LC-1966):
The clarifying text proposed by the commenter, and based on an earlier
proposal from the group, has been accepted and reads: "The value __NULL
('_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved as the null Aspect, to be employed
where a vocabulary does not use or distinguish Aspects of the properties
it defines."

----
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 16:07:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:41:40 UTC