W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg-comments@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1959)

From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:46:40 +0200
To: "rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com" <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Cc: "public-ddwg-comments@w3.org" <public-ddwg-comments@w3.org>
Message-id: <93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F48905039FA7DDC9@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet>

I accept this response

-----Mensaje original-----
De: rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com [mailto:rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com]
Enviado el: domingo, 25 de mayo de 2008 22:22
Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
CC: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1959)


 Dear José Manuel Cantera ,

The Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Device Description Repository Simple API published on 4 Apr 2008. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080525.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-ddwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 5 June 2008. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group, Matt Womer W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F489050397FB9F11@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/


=====

Your comment on the document as a whole:
> This is an editorial comment:
>
> + Check the use of <code> when referring to non-translatable terms in
> the text:
>
>   - For example in 3. Vocabularies, when boolean, int, etc. are
> mentioned
>   - For example, in 4.4.2 "SystemException" should be put between
> <code> tags.


Working Group Resolution (LC-1959):
Insofar as the original document in XMLSpec permits, from which the XHTML version is derived, the first occurrence of words that are fragments of programming source code shall be marked as such. The editors shall make their best effort to also mark all subsequent occurrences.

----
Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 08:48:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 May 2008 08:48:41 GMT