W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg-comments@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1967)

From: <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:04:49 +0000
To: (wrong string) é Manuel Cantera <
Cc: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JwIXB-000376-B1@farnsworth.w3.org>


 Dear José Manuel Cantera ,

The Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group has reviewed
the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Device
Description Repository Simple API published on 4 Apr 2008. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080514.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-ddwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 24 May
2008. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group,
Matt Womer
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F489050397FB9F3E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/


=====

Your comment on 1.2 Scope:
> This is an editorial comment:
> 
> In Section 1.2 it is said:
> 
> "The DDR Simple API does not define any Properties and does not mandate
> the use of any particular Vocabulary of such Properties.
> The DDWG strongly recommends that its Core Vocabulary is supported by
> all DDRs."
> 
> Also in Section 3 it is said
> 
> "The DDWG has published a suggested "Core" Vocabulary for essential
> Properties for Web content adaptation [Core
>
Vocabulary]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#CORE-VOCAB>.
> It is anticipated that implementations will extend the Core Vocabulary,
> which may be used as an example for such extensions. Properties that
> extend the Core Vocabulary must be in a different namespace to the Core
> Vocabulary."
> 
> ----------
> 
> Proposed Amendment:
> 
> We suggest to merge Section 1.2 paragraph with Section 3 paragraph,
> saying
> 
> "The DDWG has published a suggested "Core" Vocabulary for essential
> Properties for Web content adaptation [Core
>
Vocabulary]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#CORE-VOCAB>.
> Implementations should support this vocabulary. Additionally, It is
> anticipated that implementations will extend the Core Vocabulary, which
> may be used as an example for such extensions. Properties that extend
> the Core Vocabulary must be in a different namespace to the Core
> Vocabulary."
> 
> The above text will be in section 3


Working Group Resolution (LC-1967):
The DDWG has resolved to keep the text in section 1.2, with a minor change
to replace "DDRs" with "implementations of the DDR Simple API", and in
section 3 to add the following text: "As mentioned in section 1.2, the
DDWG strongly recommends that its Core Vocabulary is supported by all
implementations of the DDR Simple API."

----
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 15:05:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 May 2008 15:05:41 GMT