There was a submission about Supported Image Types [1]. I totally support the idea of a list of supported media formats and images are certainly on top of the list. I disagree on the suggested type, which reads:"The property is an unordered set of strings". I would rather suggest a list of properties for every image type and subtype and use a boolean type. This should be managed much more easily by developers and adaptation softwares. I suspect that an unordered list (as suggested in the Measurement field) will result in a long list hardly understandable, I cannot imaging how sub-properties such as the loop function in an animated GIF will be described in such a list, mixed with compression factors, transparency and so on. Everyone knows how this is managed in WURFL (exactly as I suggest), but I'd be curious to know how commercial products manage this, if you can share it. Andrea Trasatti [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/wiki/ CoreVocabularySubmissions#head-611f3832c41c44c8cedaa35cb98b1fc7ca1f393cReceived on Friday, 13 July 2007 20:30:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:04 GMT