W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dcci-editors@w3.org > April 2009

RE: [public-dcci-editors] <none>

From: <Sailesh.Sathish@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:10:40 +0200
To: <clayne.b.robison@intel.com>, <public-dcci-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E6C1742D0D12A447A5FBEAFC8E5EDAAF309A8707DB@NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Dear Robinson,

Thank you for your mail. The DCCI implementations did meet the exit criteria but the PR status is now put on the backburner due to some concerns and support raised by industry. We do plan to re-visit the issues soon and address these concerns. A proper timetable can only be committed to after discussions on the new charter. 

As for the exception, you are right that PROPERTY_FILTER_ERROR is also at risk as this pertains to the Filter functionality. 

Thanks again.

Best regards,

Sailesh

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-dcci-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:public-dcci-editors-
>request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Robison, Clayne B
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:06 AM
>To: public-dcci-editors@w3.org
>Subject: [public-dcci-editors] <none>
>
>Hello,
>
>After reading the DCCI W3C Candidate Recommendation, I have a few
>questions:
>
>1. What is the status of this Candidate Recommendation? Apparently,
>there were plans to submit it as a proposed recommendation sometime
>after 30 June 2008. Were the exit criteria met?
>2. In the DCCIException definition, one of the Exception codes is
>PROPERTY_FILTER_ERROR. If the DCCIPropertyFilter interface is at risk,
>is this exception code also at risk?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Clayne Robison
>Application Engineer
>Intel Corporation
>Salt Lake, UT
>801.445.0297
>
>"Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all
>peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that
>if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends."
>Maya Angelou
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 07:11:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 April 2009 07:11:44 GMT