- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:59:44 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
We are down to 14 open issues right now, and I am keen on making further progress. My take is the sooner we have the formal list of open issues down, the earlier we can focus on the informal issues raised from the outside. ISSUE-140 was last discussed https://www.w3.org/2016/09/27-shapes-minutes.html#item08 but I have to confess I did not quite understand what problem Eric was referring to. It seems that Eric was merely pointing out that validation can be defined independently from specific node selection (i.e. target) mechanisms. I of course agree with that. Could you clarify? Ted seemed to request some more detail in the spec about how the validation of individual nodes is supposed to happen. We already have one such interface, the sh:hasShape function, which can be invoked to trigger the validation of a given node against a given shape. We have no such interface for the case in which only a node is given. But we also don't formally define how the validation is triggered in the general, whole-graph case. We could potentially add a function sh:validateNode(?node) that validates the given node against all shapes with matching targets. But then people will likely complain that we are adding yet another SPARQL implementation requirement. Alternatively, Ted, could you clarify how else we can meet your requirement? Thanks, Holger On 23/09/2016 10:11, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I had raised https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/140 > myself, primarily as a reminder that validation of individual nodes > should be mentioned in the spec. I have meanwhile added a sentence > which IMHO addresses this need. > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-140 as addressed by > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/2046305962be7cd47400e7a2b51cd2841dca398c > > Holger >
Received on Friday, 7 October 2016 01:00:16 UTC