public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from May 2016 by thread

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 26 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 27 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 26 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 25 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 19 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Tuesday, 24 May)

primer.md Karen Coyle (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ISSUE-167 (implicit class scope): [EDITORIAL] implicit class scope gives impression of inferencing RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ISSUE-166 (two documents): separate out advanced part of specification [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ISSUE-165 (shapes and scopes introduction): [EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ISSUE-164 (mutable graphs): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ISSUE-163 ("constraining"): should "constraining" and other forms of "constraint" be used less in the specification [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

shapes-ACTION-37: Check what happens in the shex extension that has severities RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 19 May)

AW: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 simon.steyskal (Thursday, 19 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 18 May)

On various syntax issues Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 18 May)

agenda suggestion for this week Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 16 May)

Transitive? Holger Knublauch (Monday, 16 May)

[Editorial] Moving section 5 into section 3.3? Holger Knublauch (Monday, 16 May)

[EDITORIAL] Scope examples Irene Polikoff (Sunday, 15 May)

shapes-ISSUE-162 (section 1.2 editorial): [EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 14 May)

shapes-ISSUE-161 (terminology): [EDITORIAL] terminology fixups [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 14 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 12 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 13 May)

Simplification of scopes section Karen Coyle (Friday, 13 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 12 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 11 May)

shapes-ISSUE-160 (Generalize sh:valueShape): Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 11 May)

Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents Dimitris Kontokostas (Wednesday, 11 May)

regrets Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 11 May)

ISSUE-133 several options for syntax simplification and regularization Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 10 May)

ISSUE-133 syntax simplifications & regularizations Dimitris Kontokostas (Tuesday, 10 May)

what is inferencing? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 10 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 9 May)

Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 Dimitris Kontokostas (Saturday, 7 May)

Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? Dimitris Kontokostas (Saturday, 7 May)

New Terminology Section Holger Knublauch (Friday, 6 May)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 5 May)

Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 5 May)

ISSUE-135: Proposed changes to implement syntax simplification Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 5 May)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 May 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 5 May)

agenda suggestion Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 May)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-155 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch (Monday, 2 May)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-157 (constraint component support): the support for constraint components is incorrectly stated [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch (Monday, 2 May)

Re: ISSUE-141: Proposal for sh:type Holger Knublauch (Monday, 2 May)

Re: ISSUE-78: Proposal for Abstract Classes Constraint Holger Knublauch (Sunday, 1 May)

shapes-ISSUE-159: [Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.n [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 1 May)

Last message date: Friday, 27 May 2016 15:02:31 UTC