public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from December 2016 by author

Andy Seaborne

• (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS (Sunday, 11 December)
• [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 9 December)

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG resignation (Monday, 19 December)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 December 2016 (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 (not 13!) December 2016 (Tuesday, 13 December)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 13 December 2016 (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• WG Outlook (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Tuesday, 6 December)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 30 November 2016 (Friday, 2 December)

Dean Allemang

• Re: (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Call to action (Sunday, 18 December)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Use is/are for SHACL and MUST for processors / remaining issues (Friday, 2 December)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: ISSUE-211: Should we turn sh:property and sh:sparql into constraint components? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Making the SPARQL parts "smaller" (Friday, 16 December)
• ISSUE-211: Should we turn sh:property and sh:sparql into constraint components? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 15 December)
• Summary of edits from the last two weeks (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: Added class diagram (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 1 December)
• Added class diagram (Thursday, 1 December)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 1 December)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: DCMI decision on Data Shapes (Sunday, 18 December)

Karen Coyle

• DCMI decision on Data Shapes (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: proposal for issue-211 (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: Added class diagram (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 1 December)

Pano Maria

• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Tuesday, 6 December)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-217 (Path vs predicate clean up): Further clean up of paths versus predicate [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 9 December)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 13 December 2016 (Tuesday, 13 December)
• RE: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 (Saturday, 3 December)

Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.

• Re: DCMI decision on Data Shapes (Monday, 19 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 20 December 2016 14:12:15 UTC