- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 04:09:50 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Thanks, all. I had copied the sh:Closed from a test case of Holger's, and probably took it out of context. I'll use Simon's version. And I'll fix the other errors. Thanks again, kc On 10/1/15 3:52 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > On 10/01/2015 03:36 AM, Simon Steyskal wrote: > > [...] >> >> 1) To indicate that a shape should be interpreted as a closed shape you have >> to use: >> >> ex:ClosedShapeExampleShape >> a sh:Shape ; >> sh:constraint [ >> a sh:ClosedShapeConstraint ; >> sh:ignoredProperties (sh:nodeShape rdf:type) ; >> ] ; >> sh:property [ >> .... >> >> and not "sh:constraint sh:Closed ;" see [1] >> (unless we've agreed on some abbreviated representation I'm not aware of) > > [...] > > You may have missed: > > The core vocabulary includes an instance of sh:ClosedShapeConstraint called > sh:Closed that can be used in places where no other arguments such as > sh:ignoredProperties are needed. > > although sh:Closed does not work the same way as your example does. > > peter > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 11:10:20 UTC