Re: Core SHACL Semantics http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/

Peter,

I looked at github [1]. The last edit was by Iovka on May 18.
Therefore ReSpec is using the current date when you view it (possibly
cached for a while).

[1] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commits/gh-pages/semantics/index.html

-- Arthur

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> The date I see on http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ is 29 October
> 2015. Is this document under active development, or is this just a bad
> artifact of ReSpec?
>
> The document points at http://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-semantics/ as the latest
> published version. As far as I know, there has been no decision by the working
> group to publish this document as an official W3C publication or even any
> decision to work towards such a publication.
>
> The publication status of this document in its "Status of This Document" is
> incorrect as far as I can tell.  I am not aware of any decision by the working
> group to publish it as an Editor's Draft.
>
>
> All these may be bad artifacts of using ReSpec.   The net result, however, is
> that readers may gain an incorrect view of the status of the document and of
> the deliberations of the working group.  Either the document should be removed
> or there should be big bold flashing red warnings indicating that some of the
> status information is incorrect any only an artifact of ReSpec.
>
>
> peter
>
>
> PS:  Why should the working group care about this?  The document is being
> referenced in archived documents that people outside the working group may
> come across and these people may in turn read this document and get a false
> impression of what is happening in the working group.
>

Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 16:21:32 UTC