Re: multiple value shape?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/28/2015 08:35 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 05/28/2015 06:30:44
> PM:
> 
>> ... And yes, SPARQL is always a fallback.
> 
> Only in implementations that support SPARQL extensions. It's been
> clearly established that there is interest in implementations that don't
> support SPARQL and there are users that don't want to use SPARQL. So,
> we'd better stop thinking that "SPARQL is always a fallback". It isn't.
> 
> Given that, I think the answer to Thomas's question is more precisely:
> No, we don't have built-in support (i.e. core construct) for this at this
> point but it has been brought up.
> 
>> ...
> 
> -- Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies
> - IBM Software Group

"SPARQL is always a fallback" is a reasonable thing to say in the working grou
p.

There will be SPARQL-based implementations of SHACL, and these
implementations will include the ability to use the raw SPARQL construct of
SHACL.  If other implementations of SHACL do not implement this part of
SHACL, then all that that means is that these implementations cannot avail
themselves of this useful feature.  Users can always switch to an
implementation that does support this part of SHACL, and thus "SPARQL is
always a fallback" for them.


peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVaFhpAAoJECjN6+QThfjzSOAH/0hApr0UVk+LeGEI7kEIBsDy
1yYEwxegkXhRgJO/Qw9xHOetHKthd/G7PYVsGyRhPrH511GuDww3Pb2lGj79dKJk
NN/13Ui32AmM45PZ05uOosUNt7WznkY8WASgtjCZrOByC/YtlrWH9SOIJyS4yaPD
tzLkmLU+Fr/Vtbt8fHwjKf08j+hVonRItUM1ypSHggNMYVGQEAJgglK8kzfjcMx8
Rct8E9QuiacBzSgj6fbv9qP9ICq4xGwRWRvwq5mbufpUjyGTi59rdRwF3lVj91q0
f/KozaIYhUsJnJyFw6dm2IdEEkQLz068ArjkQyRcf5TPfSEdm3x6NlMt/WFwu8Q=
=LLI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 12:16:10 UTC