Re: what is the ShEx proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

So you would say that the three documents all describe one coherent proposal.

peter


On 05/18/2015 09:38 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-05-18
> 08:56-0700]
>> At the VF2F there is a session on ShEx proposal deep-dive/demo.  I'm 
>> assuming that this is going to be about the first proposal in 
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page#Proposals
>> 
>> There are three documents listed as part of that proposal with Eric,
>> Holger, and Iovka as editors of one or more of the documents.
>> 
>> Do all three editors stand behind the entirety of the three documents?
> 
> I have no idea how to measure that. I'm sure no one thinks the docs are
> ready for REC. I'm sure they're all fine for FPWD.
> 
> 
>> Are all three documents part of the ShEx proposal?
> 
> Yes, tutorial, semantics and SPARQL complement.
> 
> 
>> Do the three documents describe one proposal?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
>> peter
>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWhe1AAoJECjN6+QThfjzmxMIALIRX1Pxxmh9givBQ2kHkaE/
5pXeoJYIzsvTFGJqImz4E57EaZwhyFFr73R7RHwzLU0gRzp6kxW25cCuITYj41tM
x8QYVG1mg0JW7hapY/Ta37G7mx+Xsab3Vj/2kFMA8Y6uoTGkXkNeK/dvNLwgjg0k
JrimmZYd3vndfzgIodiuS7MBPfqMa1PUBkPkLui37hlrKDuo8lkjDonsP76DAU5L
vnfDpxHL7mYrQ/XF7kmoZt4vm5D2zAytekrsWKAjvx30WB3gYV3T7Wf4cGJTzBtM
NtIIHf/iLmZp7ATQ3vChEeKdN7ko/o7/kFhsMn7A17oYXnEqsg8xsFyUBc15gUU=
=Bz8U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 16:48:35 UTC