- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:58:17 +0000
- To: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Arthur, the story helps to motivate the requirement, as do those mentioned by Karen and Holger. Richard > On 21 Feb 2015, at 21:53, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > > Eric/Richard, I just created User Story S40. [1] > > [1] > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S40_Describing_Inline_Content_versus_References > > "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> wrote on 02/19/2015 09:38:34 AM: > >> From: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> >> To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> >> Cc: Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org >> Date: 02/19/2015 09:42 AM >> Subject: Re: Use cases for RDF Datasets in shape validation? >> >> * Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> [2015-02-19 07:55+0000] >>> Hi Arthur, >>> >>> You said in yesterday's F2F discussions that you think of shapes >> as being evaluated against an RDF Dataset, not just a single RDF graph. >>> >>> Are there recorded user stories or use cases, or any other >> documentation, that motivate the necessity for this? >> >> I don't think so. > >
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 18:58:42 UTC