- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:03:31 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 2/13/2015 8:19, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Is the working group producing a solution tailored for RDF data, where RDF > graphs and rdf:type are important; for RDFS data, where rdfs:subClassOf, > rdfs:subPropertyOf, rdfs:domain, and rdfs:range are also important; for > Linked Data, where dereferencing and interlinking is important; or for > services data, where brevity may be important? > > 2. Shapes and Classes > > Are shapes RDF classes, i.e., should shapes be the object of rdf:tyoe > triples, participate in rdfs:subClassOf relationships, and be the object of > rdfs:domain and rdfs:range triples? In both points you seem to assume that if we use rdfs:subClassOf then we also must use rdfs:domain and rdfs:range. Could you clarify? I would assume it is possible to use parts of the RDFS namespace without sucking in all dependencies, assuming we clarify that situation in the beginning of the specification. Thanks, Holger
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 00:04:20 UTC