using classes to control constraints

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In a discussion about the LDOM Primer
on 02/07/2015 01:58 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
[...]
> "This instance passes/fails this shape" is quite clear. Adding a type arc
> is effectively a non-starter for this group; there are too many people
> who see that is hampering re-usability of the data.

Do you mean to say that there is no chance that any prominent example of
constraints working off types will pass muster?


I am very strongly in favour of having shapes be different from RDFS classes
but I also very strongly believe that a common situation is that constraints
are triggered from class membership.  This common situation should be
prominent in the working group's documents.


peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU1iTjAAoJECjN6+QThfjzHggH/2uesgz//6gSZFJhi6bsbHAc
GaNmy3KCgbd0kmXZS1QZQ4X4RZWiyEwpXVB0sj7QckXrj6q8vIB7IFawmrVkRD2Q
UPgrLitYV62tUWlKl6s2/lxEtv1e/CEeZzLBrzSkmpwxh2JodRsrTr4zH0J2KF27
vRstwt3W+A6nBcSKVmVEzQ1J0P7YDyceeICKvuPJo8IQVBALgmwl78h7DcXd1Nm9
ZDYFPe4B37HMo0qpmJFrgl5t6qZDIWt7mXzsgBaAMmhB+LFadvBlADJCF/j+VDst
sERDO/UI/gGatxE5yYb9aciURNoLEk4JxsP/Dw/zSCqebA7h755TncYE9pT14hE=
=vjpM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Saturday, 7 February 2015 14:45:21 UTC