- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:13:23 +0100
- To: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Hi! Yes, you're totally right! We took the LDP UC&R document (nice work btw. ;)) as template and started adjusting it to our needs. Thanks for the hint. cheers, simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-02-05 21:04, schrieb Steve Speicher: > Feedback on: > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-ucr/#abstract [1] > > Has: > "To foster the development of the RDF Data Shapes specification, this > document includes a set of user stories, use cases, and requirements > that motivate a simple read-write Linked Data architecture, based on > HTTP access to web resources that describe their state using RDF. " > > which seems like it was copied from the LDP UC&R document, perhaps > tweaking it a bit to be: > "To foster the development of the RDF Data Shapes specification, this > document includes a set of user stories, use cases, scenarios and > requirements that motivate a simple language and semantics for > defining structural constraints on RDF graphs." > or something as that. > > I will review the rest at some point later, coming along nicely. > > Regards, > Steve Speicher > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-ucr/#abstract
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 20:13:50 UTC