Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed)

That's a lot of information to go through in three weeks.

peter


On 08/13/2015 07:05 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> IMHO all three belong together, and are needed to get the complete picture.
> 
> Holger
> 
> 
> On 8/14/2015 11:19, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> Is the proposal to publish only http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ even
>> though it normatively references http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/
>> and also references http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl
>>
>> peter
>>
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 03:16:39 UTC