- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:13:54 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 11/24/14, 10:59 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > Note that there is a leap between "compiles to SPARQL" and "defined as > SPARQL queries". The former is a pragmatic way to make your schema > useful on more infrastructure; the latter is a question of how > implementors, researchers, optimizers etc. will be able to understand > and work with the definition. Absolutely. Compiling to SPARQL is what I meant only. There can be any number of surface syntaxes that produce SPARQL. Holger
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 22:14:40 UTC