- From: Jeff Thompson <jeff@thefirst.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:09:45 -0700
- To: naudts guido <naudts_vannoten@yahoo.com>
- CC: jos.deroo@agfa.com, public-cwm-talk@w3.org
Are you saying that "literal subject" is only needed for rules, and so it is an extension to RDF? naudts guido wrote: > Rules are necessary an extension to RDF. > It is not possible to define rules within the semantics of RDF alone. > It is possible to consider blank nodes as variables though, > but only as local variables. > But of course things like @forAll and @forSome are extensions. > Formulas are supported however and they can be translated to RDF using lists and reifications. > Furthermore, all builtins are extensions to RDF. > > Guido Naudts
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 17:10:04 UTC