W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cwm-talk@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Where is the most actual n3 spec?

From: marcos rebelo <oleber@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <319d96980603070249h1d859041v3e2868a12e3eafde@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: timbl@w3.org, sandro@w3.org, public-cwm-talk@w3.org

after downloading

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/cwm-1.1.0rc1.tar.gz

I did wath was said in the README.

the file cwm.py dont exist, but is possible to find the cwm.

Marcos



On 2/21/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 09:15 +0000, marcos rebelo wrote:
> > After +- implemented Sparql I'm now moving to n3, but I'm havig
> > problems finding references.
> >
> > I have found 2 references:
> > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/
> >
> > but this documents are old.
> >
> > The latest is from 2004, this means that is +- stable or in diferent
> > locations (where)?
>
> actually*, Notation3.html was edited Feb 1 15:52:25 2006 UTC.
> I see the CVS keywords got broken or something.
>
> The swap/doc stuff is also fairly current, though it lags here
> and there. I hope to integrate it more closely with the test
> suite so that it becomes somewhat self-maintaining.
>
> Perhaps the best specification of N3 is the cwm test suite.
>
> In the latest release announcement
>  Cwm Release 1.1.0rc1
>  11 Aug 2005
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-announce/2005JulSep/0000.html
>
> You'll find pointers to not only the release tarball...
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/cwm-1.1.0rc1.tar.gz
> and the project homepage, with details about how to grab
> the latest source from CVS...
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm
> but also a log of log of the building of this release,
> which includes an enumeration of lots of test cases that
> were known to work as of that release:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2005Aug/att-0004/1.1.0rc1.log
>
> The /DesignIssues/Notation3 page points to a number of formal grammars
> for the language; the main one is the so-called n3.n3 i.e.
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3.n3
> with corresponding HTML version:
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3-report.html
>
> We have plans in progress to
>  (a) check n3.n3 against the test suite
>  (b) replace the hand-coded n3 parser in cwm with something
>   mechanically derived from n3.n3
>
> An RFE was filed 10 Jun 2004
>   RFE: formal N3 grammar
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/1086902566.21030.1479.camel@dirk;list=public-cwm-bugs
>
> The grammar stuff isn't the top thing on our weekly meeting
> agenda, but it's not totally starved for attention either..
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/plans#weekly
>
> We talked about it briefly last week.
> http://www.policyawareweb.org/2005/pf-dev/02-15-paw-minutes.html#item06
>
> In particular, I brought up a blog item I wrote...
>
>  bnf2turtle -- write a turtle version of an EBNF grammar
>  http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/85
>
> and timbl and I talked about g:seq and g:alt vs cfg:mustBeOneSequence
> and the like.
>
>
> > Thanks for the help
>
> Likewise, thanks for your interest in SPARQL and N3.
>
>
> > Marcos Rebelo
>
>
> * Mucho gusto encontrarte. I speak a little spanish... just
> enough to know that when you write "Where is the most actual n3 spec?"
> I should read it as "Where is the most recent n3 spec?". ;-)
>
> "acutal" is a false-cognate. If you translate it from Spanish
> to English and back, you get "de verdad".
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_cognate
> http://www.spanish.bz/false-cognates.htm
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 10:50:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:02 GMT