W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cwm-bugs@w3.org > February 2008

Re: CWM bugs list URL is 404

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:23:01 -0700
Cc: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "public-cwm-bugs@w3.org" <public-cwm-bugs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4CFEB3E7-BDD6-4D3C-83F2-6430E74E6733@w3.org>
To: Yosi Scharf <syosi@mit.edu>

Yosi,

If you make up an alternative and email it to sysreq@w3.org I am sure  
the system team will be able to do it. Could you do that, please?

I wonder whether we should

  (a) Switch to roundup  (like Tabulator original isues)
  (b) Switch to tracker (the W3C common tracker)
  (c) Do an issue-tracking pane in Tabulator (I discussed this with  
Oshani - could be fun - use the wiki)
  (d) Run the same old system from a chron job
  (e) None of the above

Tim

On 2008-01 -31, at 10:07, Yosi Scharf wrote:

> I agree. the real URI for the buglist is
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/admin/openBugs.html . It's updated  
> rarely
> (maybe I'll update it now). I've tried changing the autoreply before
> (even to get them to get rid of it) and failed. Tim, what would it  
> take
> to change that message to something nonfictional?
>
>
> Yosi
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:52 +0000, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> wrote:
>> Here is the auto reply message I got upon emailing a bug report to
>> public-cwm-bugs@w3.org:
>>
>>> From: W3C Postmaster [mailto:postmaster@w3.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:49 AM
>>> To: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
>>> Subject: Auto: public-cwm-bugs@w3.org autoreply
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report.  Bug reports are generally examined and
>>> prioritized on a monthly basis, although faster response has been
>>> known to happen.
>>>
>>> Please see http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/bugs for the current
>> bug
>>> list.
>>> . . . .
>>
>> But that URL is 404.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Booth, Ph.D.
>> HP Software
>> +1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
>> http://www.hp.com/go/software
>>
>> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not  
>> represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated  
>> otherwise.
>>
Received on Friday, 22 February 2008 04:23:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:01 UTC