James Michael DuPont wrote: >Hi all, > >I just wanted to report a small problem with a deep recursion, and >another one about self referential bnodes that might be interesting. > >First the simple one, >""" >_:a1 <#:next> _:a1; <#:val> "foo". >_:a2 <#:next> _:a3; <#:val> "foo". >""" >produces """ > @prefix : <#> . > [ ::next [ ]; ::val "foo" ]. >""" > >that would be better if it produced : >""" > @prefix : <#> . > _:a1 <#:next> _:a1; <#:val> "foo". > [ ::next [ ]; ::val "foo" ]. >""" > > > That particular bug is already fixed in CVS . see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-bugs/2004Dec/0005.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-bugs/2004Dec/0010.html . YosiReceived on Sunday, 2 January 2005 16:29:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:58 GMT