Re: Proposed Implementation

Hi Jeni,

Yes I saw your message, unfortunately for the last few months I have
been completely swamped by another project and so I had to pause
working on my implementation. I might have some time available in a
few weeks, if so I will see what I can do...

On 3 June 2015 at 17:20, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> You might have seen my plea for implementations to the list just now [1].
> Are you still intending to implement? Do you need any help/pointers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeni
>
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2015Jun/0011.html
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Adam!
>>
>>
>> > On 13 Mar 2015, at 13:49 , Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey WG, I understand you are looking for implementations.
>> >
>> > I would love to start an implementation. I'm a bit out of touch with
>> > the WG progress, can you tell me where I should start for an
>> > implementation?
>> >
>>
>> In my experience (I played with it a bit) doing a metadata checker is the
>> most complex task, ie, whatever is in the metadata document. Once you have
>> done that, producing an RDF and/or a JSON conversion is relatively easy. Ie,
>> I would start with the metadata document...
>>
>> > Also do you have any preference for implementation language?
>>
>> Not really. Whatever language is the easiest for you. I know we have
>> promises in Ruby, Python, possibly JavaScript; Java is certainly a good
>> option.
>>
>> But if you really want to play and would do, say, a Go implementation,
>> that would be cool, too:-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> ivan
>>
>> > Easiest
>> > for me would be to do one for the JVM in Scala with support for Java.
>> >
>> > However, if someone else is already working on a JVM one I wouldn't
>> > want to duplicate that. Next easiest for me (quickest to get something
>> > done) would be one of  C++, Python, XQuery or XSLT as I already have
>> > some experience with those languages.
>> >
>> > Otherwise... I wouldn't mind having a chance/excuse to play with
>> > Haskell, Elixir, Lisp, Go or Rust... although the going would be
>> > slower due to the learning curve.
>> >
>> > Anyway let me know what you need...
>> >
>> > Cheers Adam.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Adam Retter
>> >
>> > eXist Developer
>> > { United Kingdom }
>> > adam@exist-db.org
>> > irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
>> >
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
adam@exist-db.org
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 16:04:17 UTC