Re: ISSUE-2: It would be better to just have a list of known datetime formats

Here is one compilation of two dozen or so: 
http://www.xbrl.org/Specification/inlineXBRL-transformationRegistry/CR-2014-12-10/inlineXBRL-transformationRegistry-CR-2014-12-10.html


Eric E Cohen
 
PwC | XBRL Global Technical Leader
Office: 1-585-271-4070 | Mobile: 1-585-317-4799
Email: eric.e.cohen@us.pwc.com
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rochester, NY USA
http://www.pwc.com/us

Thoughts don't need paper to take shape.




From:   CSV on the Web Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
To:     public-csv-wg@w3.org
Date:   01/14/2015 10:23 AM
Subject:        ISSUE-2: It would be better  to just have a list of known 
datetime formats



ISSUE-2: It would be better  to just have a list of known datetime formats

http://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/track/issues/2

Raised by: 
On product: 






______________________________________________________________________
The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited, and all liability arising therefrom is disclaimed. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership.  This communication may come from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or one of its subsidiaries.