- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:30:08 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
On 8 October 2014 10:16, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > On 04/10/14 08:06, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>> 1. We define a small set of core properties that we consider to be >>> essential in the metadata. "We define" means that we specify the terms to be >>> used in the metadata specification as well as their data types and intended >>> meaning > > > This makes sense though I do have one small question: > > By "we define" do you include giving it a w3c-csv:xyz URI then define > skos:/rdfs:/owl: mappings to other vocabularies? Or, if not, in what way is > it different to defining a property or class? That (creating an actual vocabulary definition) sounds the simplest way of making sure we're precise. However we might not want to be more precise than the mass-deployment vocabularies we're basing it on, and both DC and schema.org are pretty flexible. And of course it is comically close to http://xkcd.com/927/ ... Dan
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 09:30:35 UTC