Ah! I did not know that. O.k., I have reinstated those fragment ID-s and pick up the fight:-) with the webmaster... Ivan On 22 Mar 2014, at 10:38 , Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 March 2014 05:25, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 21 Mar 2014, at 21:46 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 21 Mar 2014 19:00, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> I had to make some minor changes on the document to pass pubrules, like: >>>> >>>> I had to do some changes in the documents to make them conformant. >>>> >>>> - There were a number of URI-s to PDF-s that had #page=xxx fragment ID-s attached to them. Those are not legal fragment ID-s and, actually, the server did not react on them either... >>> >>> But fragments aren't sent to the server; they are interpreted client side. >>> >> >> True. But client are expected to do something with those fragments if there is a registered meaning assigned to them. Is there such thing for PDF? > > Yes, as specified in > <http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/acrobat/PDFOpenParameters.pdf#page=5> > and <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3778#section-3> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Saturday, 22 March 2014 10:17:43 UTC