Re: CSV2RDF

In the RDB2RDF work, we focused only on RDB to RDF (no roundtrip).
Therefore I agree with Jeni.

Btw, I'm catching up on the emails and minutes on CSV2RDF and Direct
Mapping. I hope that I will be able to contribute.

Best,

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>wrote:

> Thanks Andy,
>
> One point that I think is an interesting question: you addressed the
> preservation of column order at:
>
>   https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF#Column_Order
>
> I think we should concentrate on conversion *to* the other formats (RDF
> etc) rather than caring about round-tripping. So I'm not convinced of the
> value of retaining this information in an RDF mapping. How do you see it
> being used by an RDF-based application, aside from in reconstructing the
> original CSV?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org
> Reply: Andy Seaborne andy@apache.org
> Date: 19 March 2014 at 21:11:49
> To: CSV on the Web Working Group public-csv-wg@w3.org
> Subject:  CSV2RDF
>
> > Some notes on CSV+ to RDF.
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/CSV2RDF
> >
> > In no way is this completed work - consider it "in-progress".
> >
> > There seem to be three distinct levels to consider:
> >
> > 1. Tabular CSV to RDF
> > 2. Annotated Data Model to RDF
> > 3. Mapped Annotated Data Model to RDF
> >
> > and the content so far only considers levels 1 and 2 with no domain
> > specific target data schema.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 23:40:06 UTC