Re: Suggested requirement: A CSV+ Direct Mapping to RDF

On 20 Feb 2014 21:25, "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>
> Above all else, regardless of what other features the working group may
choose to define, please define a standard *CSV+ *Direct Mapping** from any
CSV+ table to RDF.
>
> By "CSV+ Direct Mapping" I mean a mapping that is fully defined even in
the absence of any information that is not contained directly within the
target table.  In particular, a Direct Mapping must be fully defined even
in the absence of any table metadata or mapping rules.
>
> Thanks!
> David Booth

Care to ground this request in a use case writeup - i.e. how it might be
useful in real life? What problem would it solve, and for whom?

Dan

>