W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [css-writing-modes-3] [css-inline-3] Need for new Ahem font version with addition of 1 glyph with Vertical_Orientation property set to U

From: Myles C. Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:52:31 -0800
Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-id: <BDB0C59F-9798-49F1-A718-5F44E55B8773@apple.com>
To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Which OS / Browser are you using? I see the horizontal lines and vertical lines on macOS & Safari.

—Myles

> On Jan 19, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:
> 
> Le 2016-08-09 16:47, Myles C. Maxfield a écrit :
> 
> [snipped]
> 
>> The codepoints which are mapped to something else are the following:
>> " " (U+20): No path but full advance
>> "p" (U+70): Path has 0 ascent but full descent
>> "É" (U+C9): Path has 0 descent but full ascent
>> Non-breaking space (U+A0): No path but full advance
>> Zero-width non-breaking space (U+FEFF): No path and 0 advance
>> En space (U+2002): No path and half advance
>> Em space (U+2003): No path but full advance
>> Three-per-em space (U+2004): No path and one third advance
>> Four-per-em space (U+2005): No path and one quarter advance
>> Six-per-em space (U+2006): No path and one sixth advance
>> Thin space (U+2009): No path and one fifth advance
>> Hair space (U+200A): No path and one tenth advance
>> Zero width space (U+200B): No path and no advance
>> Ideographic space (U+3000): No path but full advance
>> Zero width non-joiner (U+200C): No path and no advance
>> Zero width joiner (U+200D): No path and no advance
>> Greek capital letter Chi (U+3A7): Thin horizontal stripe and full advance
>> "横" (U+6A2A): Thin horizontal stripe and full advance
>> Greek capital letter Upsilon (U+3A5): Thin vertical stripe and full advance
>> "纵" (U+7EB5): Thin vertical stripe and full advance.
> 
> Myles,
> 
> I do not get the last 4 glyphs (2 thin horizontal stripe and 2 thin vertical stripe) in this test page:
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/Ahem2016TestPage.html
> 
> and I tried that test page with a browsershot web service and all the glyphs, except the last 4, were rendered on a non-Linux os.
> 
> What am I missing here? What is wrong with that test page?
> 
> The
> 
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/support/ahem.ttf
> 
> filesize is 13884bytes, so it is the correct, newest version of the ahem font.
> 
> [Addendum: this page
> https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/
> makes no mention of the 4 glyphs! It seems that the font I got from
> https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/
> never was updated with the latest Ahem font version.
> The
> https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Fonts/Ahem/
> needs to be updated with the latest version of the Ahem font.]
> 
> Gérard
> -- 
> Test Format Guidelines
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html
> 
> Test Style Guidelines
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html
> 
> Test Templates
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html
> 
> CSS Naming Guidelines
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html
> 
> Test Review Checklist
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html
> 
> CSS Metadata
> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
> 
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 23:53:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 19 January 2017 23:53:07 UTC