- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:01:17 +0200
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > CSS Syntax Level 3 invalidates some @charset tests in the CSS 2.1 test > suite. It’s not good for anyone when people think that a Level 3 > implementation is buggy when it correctly implements Level 3 but the > Level 2.1 test suite shows red. Therefore, please rescind the > following tests per > http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/post/31865121758/the-joker-shares-his-approach-on-css2-1-issues > > Tests that are invalid per Level 3 but still pass (i.e. green for a > different reason than the reason why they are supposed to be green): > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-001.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-044.htm > > Tests invalidated by Level 3: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-029.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-030.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-042.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-043.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-045.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-046.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-047.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-048.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-060.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-utf16-be-001.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-utf16-le-001.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/character-encoding-017.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/character-encoding-018.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/character-encoding-028.htm > > The reasons why the above are now invalid: > 1) BOM now overrides HTTP > 2) BOM now overrides @charset > 3) Non-ASCII @charset no longer gets honored > 4) Bogus charset names now cause @charset to be ignored, not the > sheet to be discarded. > > Tests whose validity was questionable to begin with: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/at-charset-013.htm > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsivonen@iki.fi > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ It looks like these tests are still the latest. What should my expectations be regarding getting CSS 2.1 tests rescinded when they are invalidated by newer levels? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 08:01:42 UTC