- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:45:29 -0400
- To: 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Le 2015-08-12 12:10, 塩澤 元 a écrit : > Gérard, > > I've submitted a new tests for inline-table alignment. > https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/b7df87b05e86 > > I have created tests for only 'mixed' and 'upright' because you > mentioned > that it is better to do so only for this two properties.^[1] > > [1]: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2015Jul/0035.html > > Hajime. inline-table alignment - central alignment with vertical layout http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/inline-table-alignment-002.xht Proposed minor tunings for all 4 inline-table-alignment-00? tests font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px */ replaced with font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px/60px */ <span class="row" id="last">B</span> replaced with <span class="row" id="last">T</span> I am now thinking we should have been using "L" (for last) and "F" (for first) instead of "I" and "B" in all inline-[block | table]-alignment-00? tests so that the tests are easier to review with those more helpful, meaningful characters. Overall, all 4 tests look excellent and they should be a good challenge and meaningful testing for browser manufacturers. Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 21:46:02 UTC