W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > January 2013

Re: css3 line-break tests

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:48:16 +0100
Message-ID: <50FFBFF0.9060003@kozea.fr>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 22/01/2013 17:40, Glenn Adams a écrit :
>
>     Ideally, you want the pass/fail conditions sentence to be short, clear
>     and understandable by non-web-people.
>
>
> I don't agree with the last part of this assertion. CSS test suites are
> not designed for use by the public, and it would be a distortion of
> established terminology to adopt layman terms that, by definition, are
> imprecise.

I think that Gérard is only talking about the "pass condition" that 
determines whether the test passes or not. I agree that *this* should be 
as easy to understand as possible, and should not use too technical 
terms. That way anybody can run the test suite in their favorite 
browser, and click "pass" or "fail" without having to read up tons of 
terminology first.

However, we can and should still use precisely the right terminology in 
the explanation found in  <meta name="assert" content="…">. In my 
understanding, *this* is the part meant for spec editors and implementers.

Checking thousands of tests against a given UA version takes a lot of 
time. It’s much easier if anyone can go through them, and implementers 
then only have to consider the failing tests. IMO this is the point of 
having an online test harness that collects results.

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 10:48:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 January 2013 10:48:41 GMT